Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Sichtman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Darryl Sichtman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Boxer and kickboxer who fails to meet either

WP:KICK. The only sources are just tables of his record and neither seems to be from a reliable and independent source. As a kickboxer he's fought for no major titles and is not ranked in the top 10 and he has no fights listed at boxrec.com.Mdtemp (talk) 19:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk to me 19:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. A known kickboxer with Glory potential. Just a kickboxer, not also a boxer. He already fought in the It's Showtime, Local Kombat (renamed SuperKombat after 2010), even Enfusion, and is the Tatneft Cup champion, you can check that Fightlife.ru link. A very solid promotion. Before he won the W5 event in Slovakia. He's probably in top 15-20 now. Strong record. I recommend notability tag instead as Papaursa. Thesavateur (talk) 12:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a new user interested in kickboxing articles, you might want to check the notability criteria for kickboxers at

WP:KICK. Papaursa (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete I think notability guidelines for kickboxers are pretty clear. Potential has nothing to do with notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:50, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Potential is not grounds for keeping an article. He fails to meet the notability criteria at
WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Fails both GNG and
WP:KICK. Everyone has potential, but not everyone can have a Wikipedia article. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 23:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.