Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daryl Youngblood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daryl Youngblood

Daryl Youngblood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a contested prod where the reasons given were Non-notable musician. See this Google. The prod was supported by the comment I can't find a reference that he has "5 National Number 1 hits and 9 top 10 singles." Furthermore, there is probably a COI here, as User:Duotonestudios created the article.

Based on this, we clearly need to discuss the article even though the prod can be overturned by request. Since I am simply the restoring admin and have done no due diligence I an offering no comment on the merits of this article.

• Delete,
  WP:HOAX. Not listed in the full cast and crew of Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married?, and although a Daryl Youngblood seems to have a "Myspace band," this whole article is hogwash.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete I have never heard of this guy, and if he had so many hits, I wonder why I didn't. And this clearly seems to violate
  WP:COI. Let's just delete this article and let the well-known Mister Youngblood promote himself elsewhere. --DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 02:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, per
  WP:BOLLOCKS. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC).[reply
  ]
• Delete Non-notable at best, probable hoax. Edward321 (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Hoax. No way anyone could have that many top 10 hits (or even 1 hit) without any news sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.