Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lovgren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 05:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Lovgren

David Lovgren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete it is a travesty that an only IMDb supported article has lasted 14 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He was in the main cast of
  talk) 14:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • DiamondRemley39 is there a way that we can access these sources? Do readers need a Proquest account? Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • talk) 00:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]
      • Thanks. I’m just not sure how other !keep voters can assess the quality of the sources, or how substantial the coverage of the subject is, unless they all also have Proquest accounts. Thanks for the tip, I will check with my local library. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • talk) 02:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
          ]
        • I don’t think it’s wise for me to withdraw my nomination until I can locate the sources for myself, so I will search these out and allow other editors to debate the nature of the sources. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets
  WP:ENT for significant roles in notable films. DiamondRemley39 has added some additional sources and film appearances to the article, I did a quick search on newspapers.com and found plenty of references to Canadian Indie films in Canadian newspapers that establish his notability, e.g. "The Vancouver Connection", Toronto National Post, 28 November 2000, p.E3. RecycledPixels (talk) 20:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: As per the above "Keep" arguments. Dflaw4 (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes
  WP:NACTOR as validated by the multiple reliable sources references added to the article so that deletion is no longer necessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:03, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.