Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Titterton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

David Titterton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks

WP:SIGCOV to prove notability. I looked through over 20 pages of Newspapers.com results (here), and while there is coverage of him, it's all routine. No SIGCOV on Google Books, nothing from a Google search, another one-liner. Therapyisgood (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and United Kingdom. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Again with the terrible nominations and the lack of
WP:BEFORE, my very first citation as thus [1] Basing off of that, there will be more than enough citations around to use. [2]. Govvy (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep - large number of professional appearances. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 12:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Article needs work but passes
WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment - apart from Your Herefordshire, is there anything else showing significant coverage? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reply @Spiderone: He didn't play much for Coventry, that's for sure, so it's not really noteworthy, it seems just two league games from the bench and I am not sure how many cup games, but there is a full cup game there. However he played a fair bit for Hereford United when they where in the league and a good bit for Wycombe Wanderers. Notability will be down to local newspapers at the time for those two clubs, internet news back then isn't what it is today. There are certainly some hits I found like this weird one, [3] saying his nickname was "Tits"! There is an article on Coventry City player association page. The page is certainly lacking, but that doesn't mean it can't be fixed up. It would need someone dedicated to sort it out. Govvy (talk) 14:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.