Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead Girl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to X-Statix , whose AfD is moving towards a keep at the moment. – sgeureka ^t•c 16:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Girl

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't establish notability. TTN (talk) 13:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources found, or at worst merge to X-Statix. BOZ (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge to X-Statix. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 14:10, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to X-Statix? I'm on the fence on this one. She did star in her own book (and might meet the good Argento Surfer's criteria), and I was going to say that the article should be kept and shifted to focus more on the work than the character, but after searching, all 10 reviews here are coming from Comics Bulletin, so maybe she wasn't that notable to generate interest. I searched for X-Statix material, and she gets some passing mentions from The AV Club, Paste, and Newsarama, but this is all good material for X-Statix, not Dead Girl. She got some brief mentions of how her artwork was handled in a recent book here and here, but I can't really say any of this is material that can't be adequately covered in the greater X-Statix page. -2pou (talk) 22:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Turns out IGN did a couple reviews of Issue #1 and Issue #2, but those didn't have numerical values, hence their absence from the roundup. Still, with their brevity, I lean towards saying it can be covered by X-Statix. -2pou (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to X-Statix. She kinda had a self-titled series, but the title began with "X-Statix Presents". I think her adventures are adequately described at the target article, and I would not oppose restoration if additional sources become available. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.