Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desert Tracks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Desert Tracks
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Desert Tracks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A single review in a niche publication is not sufficient to meet
Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete A nice book, but falls well short of the modest requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (books) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I tried looking looking for sources for the book, as well as for its publisher, and came up with nothing in reliable sources regarding either of them. The single review in Dragon is not sufficient to pass the ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.