Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Tower Defense

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --

Desktop Tower Defense

Desktop Tower Defense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable Flash game. Fails

• Comment - : Contested prod that was removed by an anonymous user with very few edits without leaving a reason. - Chardish 01:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft Delete This article is a video game walkthrough. Although it produces some ghits, it doesn't assert notability. the_undertow ^talk 01:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:WEB, does not show notibility. Its not verifiable outside itself. Is largely against WP:NOT for the indepth unit details. Would consider revising if any notable indepedant publication is shown and included.--Dacium 04:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails
  WP:NOT a game guide. Aside: this is a fun game, even though I suck at it. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as failing
  WP:WEB. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tower defense, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element TD, Turret Defence, and Flash Element TD. (Some duplicates, some variants of the original.) --Dhartung | Talk 06:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a video guide or walkthrough (
  T|C) 06:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete because violation of
  WP:N and its a basically the same game as Flash Element TD.Shindo9Hikaru 22:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, these games might be fun sometimes but
  Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information like game guides. -- Mithent 13:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep this article or bring back the Tower defense article and merge this into it. I just added a reference to it specifically, which is actually very tiny part of article, but I thought you all should know that that's what has been said about it so far as far as notable goes. Also when I search for news articles on just "tower defense" I get a total of four results. --luckymustard 15:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails across the board. We don't collect trivia on everything ever created here. WP:NOT covers that in various forms.--
  Crossmr 19:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.