Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhvani Bhanushali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dhvani Bhanushali

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not meeting Notability guidelines as well as continued editing by just joined users or ip's seeming to have a link with same person. Please consider it for Deletion

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:35, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've added some references and think she meets points 1, 2 and possibly 10 of
WP:SINGER. Tacyarg (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - the page creator was a sock(who is already blocked), created for the promotional edits and the article was once deleted in it's history, QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 16:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In support of Delete

Agree Note:

This article time to time gets edited by users who just joined to edit the content edited by us, adding unreferenced information. As this article was once deleted too , with issues like Notability, paid promotion this article should be removed and protected to not get re made unless the content is notable to be added or should be completely edited by admins.

That's why added the tag for deletion

Thank you,

Yours fellow Wikipedian Manupriy Ahluwalia 17:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies
WP:GNG via coverage cited ion the article. --Michig (talk) 08:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.