Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Yesenia Alvarado (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone wants to continue to work on this article in Draft space, contact me. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Yesenia Alvarado

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a G4 but same issues at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Yesenia Alvarado remain and editors keep moving it out of draft space because there's always a class project. History of that article is at the deleted (G13, mostly) Draft:Diana Yesenia Alvarado. No evidence she's a notable artist. Star Mississippi 04:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and California. Star Mississippi 04:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy heads up to instructor @AlmaLopezGDA, @LiAnna (Wiki Ed) who worked with them last time and @User:Ian (Wiki Ed) who appears to be supporting the class this time. Thoughts on how this can meet the goals of the class without necessarily being moved before it's ready, should consensus remain? Star Mississippi 04:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - There does seem to be a problem with reviewing of the Chicana Latina Art and Artists student submissions. Deb (talk) 11:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's being repeatedly recreated, it should be protected to prevent the problem. Deb (talk) 11:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails
WP:ARTIST. Source for biographical information is an interview. I can't find any reliable sources to turn this article into something that passes. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:29, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already been deleted at AFD so Soft Deletion not an option. Also, the last AFD resulted in draftification so I don't know if that is a possibility again.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps the students, I'm not at all against it. It looks like the last one was a G13 before it could be of use to this semester. Any thoughts on that aspect @LiAnna (Wiki Ed) & @Ian (Wiki Ed)? Star Mississippi 15:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi I never really thought about it, but it would be nice if there was some way to surface when students assign themselves G4-eligible articles, or when a prior draft was deleted as a G13. Where does that info in the pink box for previously-deleted articles come from? The logs for that page? Let me talk to Sage (Wiki Ed) about what might be possible (if/when time permits for him to work on something like that). Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This was deleted last year, and the recreation still lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Does not pass GNG nor NARTIST standards for inclusion. Non-notable per WP criteria. Netherzone (talk) 15:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The class for which this was written is over. No imput from instructor. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.