Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick, Colorado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dick, Colorado

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another isolated siding on a long-abandoned UP line. There was never anything around it, and it's now a spot in a field. Mangoe (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google turned up nothing, just mapquest data. As a side note, I wonder if a lot of these railroad sidings would be better as a list? For instance there have been a bunch of Arizona deletion discussions recently about old railroad siding type places, and I've thought it would be better if we could redirect pages to a list. Something like Defunct Union Pacific sidings, Colorado. Just a thought. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's something to be said for lists of names on lines, though we tend to only have those in limited cases. I'm dubious that we should have redirects for every place in these lists, though. Mangoe (talk) 00:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging The C of E—seems like this would be right up your alley. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Another railroad siding. A list of stops on a rail line would be a good idea but I'm not sure that we need to include every siding, junction, etc. –dlthewave ☎ 02:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.