Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilgar War
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Dilgar War
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dilgar War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
De-prod-ed article (sorry for prod-ing it twice). 100% plot summary (
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. – sgeureka t•c 20:42, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per my prod concerns (fails WP:GNG). I also think it may be time to consider AN(I?) discussion about a community ban from deprodding for some editors whjo deprod content that is very clearly failing our policies like GNG, etc., without providing even a shred of argument like sources, etc. in return. PS. Ping User:Andrew Davidson, maybe you could explain your deprod? Why do you think this is notable? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)]
- Delete Lack of non-universe sources establishing notability. Very disruptive to mass-deprod non-notable articles devoid of sources without providing explanation or improving article that is purely in-universe plot. Reywas92Talk 06:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Unsourced Wikia-tier fictional item. TTN (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.