Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreary Isthmus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Brown Peninsula#Dreary Isthmus. (isn't that a great place name?) Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dreary Isthmus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

UtherSRG (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Antarctica. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find anything but databases and other, unrelated dreary isthmi. casualdejekyll 23:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Isthmi? Isthmuses? Isthmodes? XD - UtherSRG (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [reply]
delete GNIS most certainly does not confer notability (based on loads of precedent), and for that matter claims about the nature of the location need to be validated against other sources. Mangoe (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merged into Brown Peninsula.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect >>> Brown Peninsula. Djflem (talk) 10:05, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect into
WP:GEONATURAL for named natural features where little more than the name and location are available. The redirect can be turned back into a full article if the isthmus becomes more notable for some reason. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Unfortunately there have have been a few editors trying to delete the Antarctica stubs rather than having the common sense to merge the articles themselves. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Wikipedia is meant to be a gazetteer, among other functions. To make the gazetteer complete, minor features that do not warrant a stand-alone article should be listed in a parent article, giving the available information. It is incorrect to purge the information from Wikipedia.Aymatth2 (talk) 17:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, WP is not intended to be a gazetteer. Frankly I think the statement that it has "some elements of a gazetteer" ought to be struck as contradicting

WP:GNG requirements. Mangoe (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

The first of the Wikipedia:Five pillars says "Wikipedia combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers."
Both
Dreary Isthmus is not notable, but can be covered in Brown Peninsula#Dreary Isthmus. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.