Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drishya Raghunath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drishya Raghunath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress who falls under too soon (if ever), so far just 2 roles and that is it, not sure how big either role is either. Wgolf (talk) 00:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:45, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not much notable, only few mentions in the news. total three movies QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as passes
WP:NACTOR with second and third billing in two nationally released feature films that have proven notability so passes criteria#1. The article needs expansion and improvement but deletion is unwarranted Atlantic306 (talk) 20:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find only two movies (not three). Still the subject fails
significant coverage. Wherever she is covered, it is press release for something, and even in that she gets passing references. —usernamekiran(talk) 09:39, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Does not meet
WP:ENT. Has had only 2 movies and not too many references are available online other than what's already here. ~Leny Tee55~ 06:29, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.