Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DutchCulture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DutchCulture

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:CORPDEPTH. A few passing mentions and social media is all I found. Kleuske (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 09:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 09:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 09:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per nom. Non-notable, does not pass
WP:GNG. Skirts⁸⁹ 12:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. I can’t find much either. Mccapra (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet general notability criteria. Spyder212 (talk) 23:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article is a fluffy and unintelligent PR piece. The topic is notable as DutchCulture is a new itteration of SICA and other organizations with a long and well-covered history. Still, in current state, we're much better off without the article. As a consequence, I'm rather happy with the direction of this discussion. While there shouldn't be a problem recreating it with the dry writeup of nl.wiki or translating it now to keep after all, this version would best be gone. It is rare that nl.wiki trumps en.wiki in anything. Since the fingerprints look clear, it may reflect a disrespect of DutchCulture for international audiences. gidonb (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.