Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echo Valley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 20:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Echo Valley

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected csp |username}}.

NN pornstar, fails WP:PORNBIO. See also AfDs on Colt 45 and Maxi Mounds created together with this article. Pavel Vozenilek 13:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP - again, your're vandelizing, nothing wrong here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.221.252.70 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 10 October 2006 — 69.221.252.70 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep - my, these people want to delete so many things, why not shut the whole site down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melbournes (talk • contribs) 03:33, 11 October 2006 — Melbournes (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep- Keep, Echo Valley is a pornstar with huge ass boobs, enough notabily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by alfredmakesapie (talk • contribs) 03:55, 11 October 2006 — alfredmakesapie (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Strong Keep - sayng this is advertising? Yeah, like any of the other sites don't do that with their official sites listed. Lame ass excuse to delete this User:Chelsea Charms fan — Chelsea Charms fan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete per
  WP:BIO and WP:PORNBIO. Vectro 04:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I should also note that Chelsea Charms fan (talk · contribs) and alfredmakesapie (talk · contribs) both signed their posts in the same (incorrect) fashion. Vectro 04:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Page now semi-protected in light of above anon. spamming. Xoloz 04:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Aaaaaand delete. Alba 04:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, and it should be noted that this user and all of his sockpuppets are also attempting to vote stack (along with the same spelling and gramattical errors) on the AfD for Colt 45 porn star. Resolute 04:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Colt 45 has appeared in those movies, it is valid. Maximounds 05:07, 11 October 2006(UTC)
• Delete per nom. God that looks painful. Eusebeus 08:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, and in cases where the actor/actress' page is kept, look into whether users by same name can be blocked per
  WP:U. Confusing Manifestation 09:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete doesnt pass WP:PORNBIO as far as I can tell.  ALKIVAR™ 03:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It is a good thing that this is not a vote. WP:PORNBIO. I don't have much else to say about it. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 17:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.