Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Comercio de Colorado
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
El Comercio de Colorado
- El Comercio de Colorado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet the standards of
WP:BASIC Marvellous Spider-Man 03:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 04:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 04:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 04:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)]
- Speedy Delete As per talk • mail) 04:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Delete: Seriously, there isn't no need for such "articles" having one single line with no reference. Delete as lack of
WP:NOT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Democratics (talk • contribs) 05:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
]
Delete, oppose speedy delete
WP:GNG anyway), I oppose speedy deletion in favour of community decision. Wikipedia:Process is important. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 05:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.