Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elder Days

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elder Days

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Elder Days have not been analysed by journalists or academics. At best, this could be a Wiktionary entry. However, I am not sure if it meets their requirements. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 14:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 14:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 14:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 14:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is at best a dictionary entry.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is just a dictionary definition, and is only referenced in passing. This term for a group of eras isn't significantly used. Hog Farm (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Faolin42 (talk) 04:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to
First Age. Goustien (talk) 05:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.