Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Windhoek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Namibia–United States relations. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of the United States, Windhoek

Embassy of the United States, Windhoek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is a content fork of the bilateral relations article, and says nothing about its purported topic, i.e. the US embassy. Biruitorul ^Talk 22:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Africa, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I don't see the solar panels as noteworthy, and the rest is already covered by Namibia–United States relations. Owen× ☎ 00:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete article appears to be about Roger A. McGuire. The solar panels is unencyclopaedic. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 00:21, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  WP:ATD. There doesn't appear to be a need to merge any to Roger A. McGuire —siroχo 02:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Unnecessary content fork. LibStar (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.