Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Şahin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emil Şahin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Peacocky promo piece on a non-notable singer. I was trying to speedy this, but a mystery IP editor with singular interest in only this article (!) popped up and removed the speedy tag, twice, which I guess is their way of telling me I should open an AfD instead. Virtually unreferenced BLP; the few sources are only cited against some of the songs. Fails

WP:MUSICBIO. Oh, and gotta love that gallery, my oh my! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any good secondary sources. Seems like a promo article. Angryapathy (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An article should
musical notability criteria. It is also obviously written to praise its subject rather than describe them neutrally. That could be dealt with by trimming if anything would be left after trimming, but very little would be left after trimming. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: I've heard of him, but that means precisely zilch as far as notability is concerned. - Sumanuil (talk) 00:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.