Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Tak (2nd nomination)

Era Tak

Era Tak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Artists, and India. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination, still not yet notable per
  WP:CREATIVE. Couldn't find SIGCOV in RS in English or Hindi (इरा टाक) - apart from what's cited here already all I could find was a typical WP:NEWSORGINDIA softball interview on News 18. Wikishovel (talk) 05:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Fails
  WP:SIGCOV. The article seems to be more promotional. Ciudatul (talk) 10:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Poor unreliable sources on the page. Page reads as publicity
  WP:PROMO. Fails notability with no significant achievement or influence notable by the subject. RangersRus (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]