Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etika
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snow keep. Additionally, this article has been posted on ITN:RD, and had already been reviewed for notability at that forum. (non-admin closure). Natg 19 (talk) 02:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Etika
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Etika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
📞 22:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the 📞 22:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the 📞 22:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Oppose Passes the GNG (even before his disapperance and death). ENT doesn't override GNG, and NYOUTUBE is an essay. --Masem (t) 22:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see much contributions to the field of entertainment. 📞 22:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- I don't see much contributions to the field of entertainment.
- Oppose I strongly oppose this as I created the page and there are MANY notable and good references so I don't even know why this is a discussion. The page is trending on Wikipedia and should be kept up. 📞 23:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- The essay 📞 23:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Also why did you copy my signature? If you reply here, please 📞 23:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- The essay
- Oppose as per talk) 23:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep - clearly passes WP:GNG, the subject in the article still meets criteria n°2 and possibly n°3. --letcreate123 (talk) 23:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Oppose this article has good references, is trending, and the person in question is a very popular figure. I don't see anything wrong with the article at all. Seems like this deletion proposal is racially motivated, if you ask me. 23:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.42.34 (talk)
- Can we not with the racism accusations? Even if the nomination may be poorly justified (which I agree, mind you), a proper debate is taking place and jumping to the conclusion that this AfD nomination is "racially motivated" is not the way to respond and it comes across as ad hominem. --letcreate123 (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Of course not. I am not a racist. Please stop making baseless accusations. 📞 00:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep appears notable. CoolSkittle (talk) 00:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as per letcreate123. --Battle Salmon (talk) 17:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the article can stay, it has plenty of reliable citations for it to stay up. Subscriber count shouldn't determine weather an article should stay. talk) 00:22, 27 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep I should believe this article shouldn't be deleted as readers, especially most of his followers on Youtube, can read his bibliography and I should consider it staying here in the article space. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 00:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep For readers of Wikipedia, like myself, there are many other YouTubers that have articles here for viewers and fans. At the time of his death, fans across social media paid numerous tributes and became trending. As he had a large fan base, deleting this is considered as disrespectful by not keeping his legacy alive. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 01:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.