Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FSH Communications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FSH Communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like a rather obvious case of non-notability but rather than PRODing, I started this so users could comment. My searches found absolutely nothing good here, here, here and here. I'm not seeing a good target unless smerged to Qwest and it's interesting to note there's a a draft for WiMactel (started last August but not formally submitted for review). SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete apparently existed only from 2004 to 213, a/c the press release that's the only citation; no reason to think they were every notable. DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - searches turned up nothing to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.