Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Nicolas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Felix Nicolas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:POLITICIAN. Only elected officeholders are presumed notable. Lapablo (talk) 17:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete That is a huge PR piece if I've ever seen one. It reads like a PR flyer hand out and is overly promotional. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:49, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.