Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fern Bayer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

WP:ATD, I am encouraging we merge any worthy information to the appropriate article (can be General Idea#Legacy or whatever) and then redirect to the chosen article. Missvain (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Fern Bayer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable art historian. Her notability stems from a long association with General Idea, but any coverage stemming from that association is all about GI and not about her. --- Possibly (talk) 01:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 01:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete none of her awards are notable by themselves, all her relevant work is with her association of GI. --hroest 00:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Partial merge into General Idea#Legacy. She appears to have been made the official archivist of the collective in 1995 by AA Bronson (see [1]). pburka (talk) 22:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect. Her work as curator seems to have been the kind that stays offstage and gets things done while shunning personal publicity. Which I think is a good thing, but it also means no notability for that. Searching only found her name in association with General Idea, so a mention there and a redirect make a plausible solution. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.