Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fika Recordings
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:43, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fika Recordings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Of the sources in the article, the only kinda in-depth coverage is in WeGotTickets (a ticketing company?) and DrownedInSound (web-zine). There's an interview w/ the founder in BBC Music blog, but I'm not convinced any of these are strong enough
WP:BEFORE in newspapers.com, google news/books, pressreader didn't turn up any additional coverage beyond mentions. Considered ATD but I don't see a clear merge or redirect target as the founder doesn't appear to be notable and the record label is associated with multiple musical groups. Zzz plant (talk) 00:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and United Kingdom. Zzz plant (talk) 00:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. I'd say this clears the hurdle of WP:MUSIC's sense of one of the more important indie labels, and the Drowned in Sound and BBC coverage are solid starts on sourcing. Chubbles (talk) 13:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)]
- Keep. it's always harder for music labels to qualify, as they may not have direct or significant coverage per policies, but in my opinion it should be kept due to coverage of their artists, hence considered a notable label. i,e Authors qualify if they have book reviews, hence labels qualify if they have artist reviews. Darkm777 (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - agree with @Darkm777, I disagree with deleting articles of companies that played a significant role in creating multiple notable products (in this case, artists). DCsansei (talk) 05:44, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I can't find anything in WP:NCORP, and unsure if notability could be inherited from being associated with notable groups. Zzz plant (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)]
- Keep I agree with both sides but still think the page should be kept, and that sources might be found and added later. Cinder painter (talk) 06:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.