Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial Monitoring Service (Azerbaijan)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Corruption in Azerbaijan as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 02:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Financial Monitoring Service (Azerbaijan)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an Azerbaijani state initiative from 2009 to make the government appear less corrupt. There are no independent reliable sources in the article. Thenightaway (talk) 18:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Corruption in Azerbaijan: no independent notability. Owen× ☎ 21:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Generally we have found state entities like this to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would like to see at least two more editors' comments.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TLA (talk) 11:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lean towards keep, but only if purely Azerbaijan-language sources are allowed, because that's all that's out there. The BBC's Azerbaijan chapter only ever mentions them in articles written in Azerbaijani, a couple times a year:[1]. Official media and a site called 'Concrete'[konkret.az] tend to just release or repeat official statements. Wizmut (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what language sources are in. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG and NORG. All sources fails WP:IS. BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS. Azerbaijan government sources are not independent reliable sources for the subject. No objection to a consensus redirect to Corruption in Azerbaijan. // Timothy :: talk 05:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of the article looks like a copy and paste, possibly a translation off the official website. LibStar (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.