Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona McIlwham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:06, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Fiona McIlwham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. As several AfDs have shown , ambassadors are not inherently notable, so recycling the old keep by virtue of their position doesn't work. Secondly, I could only find coverage confirming she is an ambassador but nothing in depth. LibStar (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, although weakly so; if article had actual references showing notability (they might be out there) I would reconsider my stance. Neutrality^talk 02:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.