Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FitDay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 21:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FitDay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of many such trivial appplications; no evidence of notability for this particular one. DGG ( talk ) 08:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. One or two brief reviews, but not in-depth. If this was a video game, it would fail the detailed video game referencing standards. As it is, it just fails
WP:GNG, unless someone can dig out a better review. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the article was started, and most of the contents written, in 2009 by an undeclared paid editor, banned in 2010 even under the much less strict rules at the time. The editor worked almost exclusively on the various products of Internet Brands. Most of the individual article they started then have since been deservedly deleted. That added factor, which I had not noticed when I made then nomination here ,should be enough to make even clearer the need for deletion DGG ( talk ) 17:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.