Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Mile House (Illinois)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 04:57, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Five Mile House (Illinois)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Five Mile House (Illinois) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable historical building. Not listed on the NRHP [1]. Sourcing is all primary. Appears PROMO for a tourist attraction. Oaktree b (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Consdering the AfD posting was the third-ever edit to this new page, and the page is only sourced to primary sources, a good WP:BEFORE search is necessary and it's crystal clear this house comes up often in multiple local news sources (newspaper and television), and has been referenced in several books. There's a chance the coverage as a whole doesn't add up to GNG, but there's definitely coverage out there, and I haven't even searched old newspapers yet. SportingFlyer T·C 14:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)]
- Keep Historical buildings don't have to be on the NRHP to be notable, and this one has plenty of coverage in non-primary sources: see [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. It's included in the Illinois Historic Sites Survey Inventory, though their database is under construction so finding info is a bit of a pain right now. It's also been referenced in books, as SportingFlyer mentioned. The article needs cleanup and better sourcing, but AfD isn't cleanup. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 17:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.