Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flaming Wheel Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flaming Wheel Studios

Flaming Wheel Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable studio. Looks like an advert. Lacks

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and United States of America. DMySon (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A Google search only revealed a few primary sources, eventually spiralling off-topic entirely (merely showing sites containing words "flame", "wheel", and "studio"). The one source listed on the article does not even mention the subject. Not to mention the page itself is just a list of its filmography despite its almost non-existent internet coverage. Certainly not notable.
  talk to me!) 11:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Delete: Not to mention, there are barely any sources, there's only one, this page needs to be deleted ASAP, as the "studio" also is simply a fandubbing group rather than a full-on company, also side-note, on further inspection, the person who wrote the article seems to be a groomer, as searching up "Mbeausejour" mostly brought up "Mitchy Beausejour", an internet user who recently got exposed for sending a picture of his crotch to minors... I say once the page gets deleted, ban the user as-well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pong3SouthFrieza34 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]