Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fltplan.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 15:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fltplan.com

Fltplan.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Makes some claims of notability but still not sufficient to meet

• Note: This debate has been included in the
  talk) 06:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Apparently a website for pilots to create flight plans on. References are to Internet directories and trade publications. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:24, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a problem with listing trade publications? The^FSAviator • T 04:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep has a couple of hits on gnews. Some of these are in passing, but it suggests this could be notable. (I'm not sure if all flight trade publications are on gnews, if they aren't this could be more notable.) OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 19:27, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article creator is a probable SPA: Mrswrite (talk · contribs) OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 19:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Appears to meet
  talk) 17:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Note: This debate has been included in the
  talk) 22:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Meets
  Flank speed 02:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Has been sourced and seems to be well-written. The^FSAviator • T 22:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.