Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward market

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forward market

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2009. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Economics. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to
WP:SIGCOV. 0xDeadbeef 13:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep, passes
forward exchange market though (i.e. should it be merged here or to foreign exchange market). SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 02:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep, for now, since this is a topic which passes
WP:GNG per the book sources that have now been added to the article, whether it needs to be a standalone or should be merged somewhere can be decided later. Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per above Andre🚐 01:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, consider new additions to the article that address the "unsourced" comment in the deletion nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.