Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fragmented distribution attack (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fragmented distribution attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the

missfortune 16:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete Appears to be something made up in the conference presentation linked to in the article ("An attempt to define the Fragmented Distribution Attack"), and on which the article is entirely based, but which has since failed to gain traction and therefore fails
  WP:GNG.--Pontificalibus 21:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment I just found Intrusion detection system evasion techniques#Fragmentation and small packets which could be a suitable redirect target.Pontificalibus 09:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No references, ergo no article. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - notability not established, possible redirect mentioned by Pontificalibus would seem okay too.--Staberinde (talk) 16:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.