Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fredrik Zanjanchi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Arguments on the delete side carried far more weight than those on the (weak) keep side. Owen× ☎ 01:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fredrik Zanjanchi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This footballer has never played fully-professionally, so fails

WP:ROUTINE coverage. Regarding transfer news, we also have a piece about him not being signed. Match reports from lower level do not constitute significant coverage. Geschichte (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Sweden. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep – The athlete has 19 appearances for Ögryrte, which is completely professional, in addition to the article on sv.wiki being supported by a satisfactory number of sources. Svartner (talk) 19:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I am also in agreement with Svartner. When I had a look at sv:Fredrik_Zanjanchi I feel there might be enough to scrape by. Regards. Govvy (talk) 19:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's pretty clear that every reference in the Swedish article are
WP:ROUTINE. Geschichte (talk) 22:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing.
WP:PRIMARY, nothing that meets IS SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 16:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.