Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friendship Association Norway–Albania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Only comment casts doubt on the nomination and there was no other participation. RL0919 (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Friendship Association Norway–Albania

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:ORG. I tried searching under its English and Norwegian names and could not find any coverage. There isn't even a Norwegian version of this article. LibStar (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment. It was one of many fronts for the Workers' Communist Party. Here is the relevant search in Norwegian, yielding 175 newspaper results. So the notion that no coverage exists is untrue, but I have yet to actually sift through the 175 hits. Most of the hits in Klassekampen are probably primary sources, but the rest may not be. Geschichte (talk) 09:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.