Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAP (G.A.P.) Ensemble

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GAP (G.A.P.) Ensemble

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sources which indicate that

WP:NMUSIC is met SmartSE (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - non-notable ensemble. Classical music is awesome, so I am a bit saddened to say this. But no evidence of notability nor reliable sources. Just trash sites like apple music, deezer, amazon, google play, blank Allmusic page, concert sites, the website of the subject and various retail sites. It has no articles on other Wikipedias. Also, the creator of the article hadn't edited anything else besides this article and its talk page, so there's a COI (conflict of interest) around here. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete: I didn't want to vote delete, but doesn't meet

WP:GNG.   // Timothy :: talk  14:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC) [reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.