Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautam School (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gautam School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof that the school is the best in the region and no sources. Domdeparis (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is a secondary school that exists. See
wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Sure, strike the sentence about it being best, like we strike similar in every school article when such gets added. Put a little effort into developing articles on rock-solid topics like this instead of trying to force others to. --do ncr am 02:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment why are there two afds running for this article, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautam School. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. Merge the two AfDs. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Its a secondary school. It exists. It is notable. Merge the two AfDs. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.