Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gimmie

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gimmie

Gimmie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from a LifeHacker page, I can't find much in-depth significant coverage that passes

WP:NPRODUCT. SITH (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep Not exactly hogging the headlines - there's plenty of instances of the same useless (for notability purposes) bare-bones note around; but also this [1], which is somewhat more expansive. Might just squeeze through. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - it's a thing, but not every thing is notable. Bearian (talk) 23:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.