Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanny Romero Infante

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanny Romero Infante

Giovanny Romero Infante (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimally sourced biography of a person, which literally just states that he existed, the end. It says absolutely nothing of substance about his career to determine whether he would have a credible notability claim under our inclusion standards for either journalists or activists at all -- and for sourcing, all it contains is two different news articles announcing his death, which is not enough coverage to get him over the "notable just because media coverage exists" bar in lieu of having to provide any substantive reasons why he might be notable. Both in substance and sourcing, it takes more than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the es.wiki article shows sourcing and notability so it just needs tagging and expansion, not deletion. Mccapra (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per
    WP:SIGCOV. With literally three clicks, I found two reliable English-languages sources. Bearian (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.