Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldblade
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (NAC). American Eagle (talk) 05:59, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Goldblade
- Goldblade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Written like an advert and appears to be copy-pasted from another site. Also not notable. Razakel19 (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. The nomination makes no sense at all. Several albums on prominent labels, notable members including ]
- Keep Multiple members previously in other notable bands, 2 albums on Captain Oi, a "more important" indie label. ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Keep Reliable sources easily found here and here, meets ]
- Speedy keep per above. Hardly reads like an ad to me, asserts notability finely, just needs cleanup. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 21:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:SNOW Keep It needs cleanup, but it is notable. I don't understand what nominator means with "written like an ad". Acebulf (talk) 00:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. Per Hammer. AfD is not a forum to force clenaup. Sources above more than establish notability, no link for a copyvio. I respectfully suggest the nominator read WP:BEFORE and utilise {{advert}} instead of {{subst:afd1}}. HJMitchell You rang? 11:19, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.