Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Tone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Google Chrome. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google Tone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is mostly a procedural nomination; see WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 15#Google Tone and the page's own history for more info. (Basically, this article used to be a draft, one AFC reviewer thought the topic was notable while another one did not, the article got into mainspace, got BLARed to Google Chrome, and now I'm restoring it and sending it here.) That said, even though the reflist isn't impressive, the Google News search results on this topic have a somewhat better showing, so I don't really know whether this article should be kept or deleted/merged/redirected actually. Duckmather (talk) 02:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Computing. Duckmather (talk) 02:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a reference. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 06:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Google Chrome, ideally to a section on accessibility, but somewhere like the extensions sections might work since the accessibility section does not currently exist. This subject does not have enough independent notability for its own article in my opinion. - Indefensible (talk) 06:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge support the merging idea. Google Chrome is a right place for this information. Old-AgedKid (talk) 07:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @TartarTorte, Ahunt, InfiniteNexus, Scyrme, Skarmory, and Lenticel: this is a courtesy ping for y'all since all of you participated in the original RfD. Duckmather (talk) 15:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Barely any coverage past its launch in 2015, fails
WP:GNG and WP:SUSTAIINED. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge – doesn't seem to be much sustained coverage, don't think this is currently a good fit for a standalone article, but there's enough the info should go somewhere. Not sure the best target as of now (Google Chrome#Extensions isn't structured well for it to go there, though it can always be adjusted). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 19:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per InfiniteNexus. lizthegrey (talk) 22:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.