Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guto (footballer, born 1991)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guto (footballer, born 1991)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about footballer who has only played semi-professionally except for 3 second-half substitute's appearances in the

WP:GNG as this does, the presumption isn't valid. Jogurney (talk) 04:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 11:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - scraping by on NFOOTBALL is insufficient when there is a complete lack of coverage, failing GNG. Giant Snowman 11:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's better to have a complete set of articles here for
WP:GNG as a reason to delete an article, there's no reason to say they shouldn't be as a reason to keep an article. Peter James (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - completely and utterly fails
WP:NSPORTS that the SNG are only there as a guide on whether something passes GNG or not and that meeting the SNG does not mean that the article has to be kept. Spiderone 19:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete since the arguments for that are valid, and the arguments for keep are invalid. Geschichte (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.