Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Zakaria bin Muhammad Amin (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Zakaria bin Muhammad Amin

Haji Zakaria bin Muhammad Amin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG (the sources below aren't notable). Created by sockpuppet. Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Strong Keep. This is a featured article in Indonesian Wikipedia with plenty of sources in that language.--Esprit15d • talkcontribs 14:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment @Esprit15d: Upon examining the nomination discussions of this featured article on Indonesian Wikipedia, we'll find that the article on Indonesian Wikipedia is essentially a translation of the one on English Wikipedia. This conclusion is based on explicit statements made by the nominator. Ckfasdf (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politicians, Islam, and Indonesia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete The individual's purported notability primarily arises from orchestrated efforts by a sockmaster and their accomplices to boost his profile across platforms, including Wikipedia. However, his importance appears to be largely restricted to Bengkalis Regency, with minimal recognition beyond this local area, let alone nationwide in Indonesia. While he may have some standing within the local Muslim scholar community, his broader significance is dubious. It's worth noting that the main source cited in the article, Saputra 2020, focuses on the 21 ulamas in Bengkalis regency rather than specifically highlighting him. Similarly, the other references in the article lacks substantial individual attention directed at him. Moreover, if he truly held significant status in Bengkalis regency, his name would likely be documented in regional history books. However, upon examining historical texts issued by ministry of education and culture, such as these in books 1 and 2, his name is notably absent. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He also lacks significant coverage per
WP:SIGCOV, with the only sources about him being this book, and a passing mention in this website. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.