Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halcyon Way
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Halcyon Way (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Delete At the moment no evidence that it passes WP:Notability (music). Also seems to be a copyright violation.--SabreBD (talk) 19:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a person, animal, organization or web content but which fails to assert the importance of its subject, because... (your reason here) --Jared may (talk) 04:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
This Band Halcyon Way is a Perfectly Good Band, and yet there is no Wikipedia Page for this, so I Decided to Create this Page. This Bands Deserves a Wikipedia Page.
This Band could become the Next Avenged Sevenfold Knowing their Musical Skills. They're Definetly a Creative, Unique and Good Band. They Should have a Wikipedia Page because of this. They attract Millions of Heavy Metal Fans, and are better than a Great Number of Musicians Nowadays.
There is a Perfect Reason for this Band to have a Wikipedia Page, because they are Highly Notable for their Skills. Regardless of how Big the Page must be they Should still have a Wikipedia Page.
For my Proof of that this Band Attracts Millions of Heavy Metal Fans Visit this Link and see how many Heavy Metal Fans like them: http://www.facebook.com/halcyonway — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay yok may (talk • contribs) 08:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Until they became "the new Avenged Sevenfold" this is not for Wikipedia. WP:A7 Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the comment by jay yok may proves what is already fairly clear from the article, that the intent is promotional, and the result is a high promotional article that , if the band were notable , ,would need to be started from scratch. I'm not confident enough in this subject to do a speedy by G11, but perhaps a more knowledgable admin will. DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.