Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harling Mural Art

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 20:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harling Mural Art

Harling Mural Art (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently an autobiography. User already blocked on three other projects for self-promotion. All the sources are basically crap, social media and the like. I don't see basically anything in English. Possible there are non-English sources, but given that they have been blocked on id.wiki as a sock of an account blocked for promotion (see [1]) it doesn't inspire confidence. GMGtalk 20:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Autobiographical article (as per page history) is promotional, lacking in reliable sources and fails notability criteria. Netherzone (talk) 20:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I removed wordpress, instagram, wikiquote... the whole Smorgasbord of unreliable sources. The earlier version could be an example page for what is not a
    talk) 21:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete (possible speedy A7): A
    WP:SPA autobiography which is not making credible claim to notability, supported by poor references. (There is also a Draft:Harling Bassukarno - more detailed biographically but still lacking credible referenced notability.) AllyD (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Speaking of drafts, a
talk) 05:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
They keep doing it, they seem to really want to see their sig in the article, or they do not understand signatures. It is promotional editing.
talk) 06:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk) 15:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.