Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hearthis.at

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hearthis.at

Hearthis.at (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject at this time. Searches return thousands of hits, but they all appear to be the most passing possible of mentions of their url, like here, and truckloads of hits for the Dallas Observer, but only because they've embedded files in hundreds of pages.

The source currently in the article is more along the lines of what we're looking for, but even that described the site as "minuscule", noting that nine plays on one of the news station's playlist reached the top ten in the genre.

Overall looks like

WP:TOOSOON, and the absence of a de.wiki article for a German founded website doesn't bode well either. GMGtalk 14:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree with assessment as
    WP:TOOSOON. It does look like an up and coming competitor to Soundcloud, but results are just "Top X alternatives to Soundcloud" type articles, that usually mention that this service is "little known" and has few users at the moment. When more dedicated coverage turns up, I think this article will be worth creating. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 20:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per nom. SportingFlyer talk 00:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.