Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heechee
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Clear consensus that there is something worth keeping. Consensus favors a rename and change of focus, but without a clear target. Further discussion on the best way forward can take place on the article talk page. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Heechee
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing
WP:TNT or at least major gutting/rewriting are in order (the article is unfortunately focused on the almost certainly-not-notable fictional alien race, instead of on the maybe-notable book series). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Rename Washington Post article "Gateway to a Wonder", Publishers Weekly ("Since it began with the novel Gateway (1977), Pohl's Heechee series has been among the most consistently daring of SF's continuing enterprises") and a fair bit in Pohl's entry in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)]
- Rename & Cleanup - The series appears to be notable, per Clarityfiend, and the first couple sections of the article are definitely salvageable to keep as the basis of an article on an overview of it. If its renamed as suggested and all of the unsourced plot cruft that makes up the second half is removed, we're left with a workable stub article on the series. Rorshacma (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above sourcing and as a classic Sci-Fi series that has inspired others: [2]. Rename, consolidation, and cleanup are all welcome. Gateway Saga would be another possible rename. Jclemens (talk) 06:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep not seeing an applicable deletion rationale here outside of just liking deleting things. Artw (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Like Artw Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.