Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heldeep Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heldeep Records

Heldeep Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable vanity label from DJ Oliver Heldens, fails the criteria under

• Delete - Subject is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources, thus lacking notability. Meatsgains (talk) 00:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - notable label that can use expansion. There are significant coverage of reliable sources on Google. - TheMagnificentist 06:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep per TheMagnificentist, it's a notable label that can use expansion. There are significant coverage of reliable sources on Google. 141.138.146.132 (talk) 10:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.