Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highland Records

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) feminist 15:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Highland Records

Highland Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, could not find sources, most of the search results are about another non notable record label in Louisville, KY. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Highly notable label. At least three very, very notable artists recorded for the label. Angel Baby was a huge national hit on the label. Search Google Books for " "Highland Records" "Billboard" " and you'll get results. Because the era, most sources are probably not digitized yet. As is, there is enough verifiable information out there to make a useful article about a topic of interest to record collectors, musicologists and music historians. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Passes
    WP:GNG. The search suggested above indeed shows results. -- Dane talk 06:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.