Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hohead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hohead

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article states it is based on someone's life growing up and has no references. LongLiveMusic (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. No refs, not encyclopedic, not notable. Easy decision.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 10:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this term was common knowledge at the time, and a lot of blood was shed from being bullied and physically attacked. So called hoheads formed the majority of those protesting the Viet Nam War. This is not just my opinion, it is what happened in the bigoted Washington D.C. suburbs. Delete if you feel necessary, hide the truth because it was too ugly if you chose to. But talk to anyone (brave enough to tell the truth) who resided in Virginia or Maryland then and they will tell you why the S.D.S. was rooted in Maryland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.246.165.8 (talk) 22:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC) added references signed iamnowa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamnowa (talk • contribs) 22:37, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment The references do not mention the term "hohead". Not notable. No evidence that the term exists outside the mind of the author. And more of the same won't help.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete
WP:MADEUP at best, possible Speedy G3-able blatant hoax. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:02, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.